Vol. 3 No. 23 (2022): RM

JTIT 3/2023

Opis wydania Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet interdum dapibus tellus. Donec nonummy, erat. In bibendum tempus. Suspendisse elit ornare arcu erat, fringilla ut, metus. Nullam id enim. Fusce facilisis eget, cursus at, congue sit amet neque odio fermentum vestibulum. Nulla dignissim. Phasellus facilisis eget, auctor nibh, dictum aliquet at, suscipit et, tristique interdum. Nulla vitae ipsum enim, malesuada fames ac lacus. Integer semper id, commodo est porta sed, sodales rutrum, wisi semper id, libero. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per conubia nostra, per inceptos hymenaeos. Fusce convallis at, congue eget, purus.

Published: 05-03-2024

Articles

  • Ponownie darwinizm kontra inteligentny projekt

    It is a review of Michael J. Behe’s book titled Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (The Free Press, New York 1996), containing the criticism of evolutionary theory. During last years, according to the author, this is the most refined attack on Darwinian evolution, but he disagrees with Behe. He criticizes his concept of irreducible complexity and proposes his own evolutionary solution to the problem of origin of irreducibly complex biochemical systems.

    Kenneth R. Miller
    9-30
  • Sublime balance

    It is a review of Michael J. Behe’s book titled Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical CHAllenge to Evolution (The Free Press, New York 1996), containing the criticism of evolutionary theory. Author criticizes Behe’s thesis that irreducible complexity of biochemical systems suggest they were designed by an intelligent designer, i.e. that they were not produced gradually by the working of natural selection. According to the author, irreducible complexity can be a result of the action of evolutionary process called gene duplication. He also thinks that the reference to the supernatural factors to explain phenomena occurring in nature has the same value as explanations invoking miracles, and this, according to him, cannot be described as a scientific practice. Scientists should hold on to the principle of methodological naturalism.

    Robert Magdziak, Russell F. Doolittle
    55-64