Wielki projekt życia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21641/demo.v1i2.18Keywords:
creationism, intelligent design theory, Darwinism, evolution, suboptimal designAbstract
On January 1982, judge William K. Overton, during a famous law case in Arkansas, handed down a decision that creationism is not a scientific theory. One of the arguments for creationism was an argument from design. Later it became a fundamental argument for intelligent design theory which presently, in author’s opinion, is the most important alternative to theory of evolution. Author is critical about intelligent design theory. In his opinion, it is a theory which requires us to pretend we know less than we really do about living organisms, design, engineering, and information theory. It demands us to set aside simple and logical evolutionary explanations of design flaws in living organisms and to accept a vague theory that seemingly explains everything by stating: „that is the way the designer made it”. Thus, it is only an argument from ignorance, whereas modern biology offers new evidence that organisms emerged gradually in the process of evolution.
Downloads
References
Darwin Korol, O powstawaniu gatunków, PWRiL, Warszawa 1959.
von Wright G.H. and Anscombe G.E.M. (eds.), Notebooks, 1914-16, Blackwell, Oxford 1961.
Bork Robert H., Slouching Towards Gomorah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline, Regan Books, New York 1996.
New York Times, 26 października 1996, s. A25.
New York Times, 25 października 1996 , s. A1.
Muller H.J., „Reversibility in Evolution Considered from the Standpoint of Genetics”, Biological Reviews 1939, vol. 14, s. 261-280.
Graur W.-H. LI and D., Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution, Sinauer, Sunderland MA. 1991.
Coyne J.A., „God in the Details”, Nature 1996, vol. 383, s. 227-228.
Commentary 1996, wrzesień, s. 22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 DEMO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet quam leo, cursus vitae, commodo convallis consequat. Donec pulvinar porta neque, blandit risus commodo sit amet ante. Quisque condimentum. Donec orci interdum euismod scelerisque tincidunt. Maecenas vitae mi. Pellentesque orci vitae nunc venenatis tristique, convallis accumsan, dolor sit amet metus. Curabitur tempor. Phasellus sem. Quisque.